Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival
(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible -- do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media -- pass it on and spread the word)
by Val KoinenNovember 27, 2014
Yesterday we were treated to another stellar example of the pro-Black, anti-White bias so glaringly evident in (so-called) 'news coverage' on cnn.com. All morning long their web site featured an article entitled Michael Brown's father: 'They crucified his character.' About mid-day I noticed the featured article had changed to: Michael Brown's mother: 'This could be your child.' At some point during the day I noticed that the earlier link, to the former article, had morphed so that it took you to the latter article, which includes the essentials of the earlier article's story line. That combined article about comments made by Brown's parents yielded later in the evening to the featured article The new threat: 'Racism without racists' which stayed up until early this morning. None of these articles speak to the reality of what happened in Ferguson, or to the real-world, truthful basis of White people's well justified, defensive racism.
The statements made by the parents of Michael Brown, the overgrown pothead thug shot last August by White police officer Darren Wilson, are just so much of the same-old outrageous nonsense of demands for special treatment for the noble Negroes even when they are engaged in criminal activity. They would seem to demonstrate, more than anything else, a woeful lack of understanding if not blatant misrepresentation of what actually happened to their son, why it happened, and the way our civilized legal-justice system works and is supposed to work. The same can be said for an article that appeared on the Yahoo news site: Michael Brown's parents react to Darren Wilson interview: 'It sounds crazy.'
So here we have an entire day's 'news' reporting centered on the reasons White people (even cops) should ignore Negro criminality, why they should risk their lives by not taking appropriate action against out-of-control hulking Negro thugs, and why they should just roll over and accept that they are required to strive to deny racial realities. As usual, it's just more unrealistic and unreasonable TNB ('typical nig**r behavior') -- blaming everybody and everything but the savage and uncivilized behavior of the Negroes themselves. As is usually the case when it comes to Negro criminality and rioting, and when they are shot by police, the truth is -- plain and simply put -- their attitudes and behavior merely demonstrate once again the Negro's incapacity for living in a rational, civilized society. Just more proof that they can't participate successfully in our White-built, Western-Civilization society.
Then, to make matters worse, our pseudo-President, the mulatto Obama, once again stepped into the fray and stoked the flames of ignorance and savage anger of the Negroes, as reported in this article. Shades of Trayvon Martin -- Obama and his mulatto Attorney General Eric Holder just can't seem to refrain from joining that esteemed scholar and community leader Al Sharpton in aiding and abetting Negro violence every time true justice visits one of their errant 'youth.'
All of this Negro-nonsense behavior sure does bring into focus just how prescient our early-day Presidents Jefferson and Lincoln were when they wrote:
Jefferson: 'Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.'
Lincoln: 'I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in anyway the social and political equality of the white and black races - that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race. I say upon this occasion I do not perceive that because the white man is to have the superior position the negro should be denied everything.'
It is striking to me how apropos their comments are to the Ferguson situation. In fact, they provide a good, rational basis for a rejoinder to many of the ignorant statements presented in the articles cited above.
Of course, some present-day writers have also said some very sensible things about the events that have recently transpired in Ferguson, Missouri. For some balance, rationality, and sober truth-telling with regard to the unfolding Ferguson drama you might want to read Pat Buchanan's 'Moral Befuddlement in Ferguson.' and Dr. Kevin MacDonald's 'Ferguson will speed up the racialization of American politics.'
So once again the message is brought home to us loud and clear: We simply must reach more of the White majority -- our White kinsmen -- with our message of the true, natural, normal rationality of racial awareness and White self interest. And we must put unrelenting pressure on our White Senators and Representatives in the U.S. Congress, and elect new members of Congress, who will look out for our interests as opposed to the interests of the Jews and the colored underclasses.