White People Worldwide:

Resist or regret
Work for what's good for our people
Help stem the dark tide
Stand tall or be beat down
Fight back or die



Thursday, April 23, 2015

MY KIND OF 'BIG TENT' APPROACH


Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival
(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible -- do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media -- pass it on and spread the word)

by Val Koinen
April 23, 2015

If you haven't already, please check out the previous post and the comment and question posed by Katana.

Good question.  Why don't writers like Jared Taylor and Fred Reed 'name the Jew'?  I don't know the answer(s).  About the best I could say would be '...well, we will just have to ask them.'  But wait a minute -- we have already done that, and their answers are what seem to bother Katana (and me, and a lot of other White Nationalists).  We have all noticed that when we do get some discussion of this issue from them, something just doesn't seem right.  At best, and giving them the benefit of the doubt, they seem to be giving us just part of the answer, and there does always seem to be some disingenuousness wafting through the air.

I agree that this apparent deceit, even possible subterfuge, is a little bothersome and worrisome.

I do think the answer is complicated, and most likely a combination of one or more of the following:

1) They are disinformation agents working for organized Jewry -- deliberately doing the work of the Jewish deceivers, in some cases by covering up the nefarious work of the Jews, or leading White readers away from the Jewish involvement in all the past and present anti-White goings-on.

2)  They realize that we Whites ourselves are largely to blame for our problems (subservience to the colored underclasses, cultural destruction, racial suicide and genocide, etc.) as a result of our naivety, greed, lust for political power, ignorance and/or stupidity, laziness/carelessness/callousness toward our fellow White people, or just general altruistic soft-headedness.  And understandably, in their minds, that awareness tends to absolve the Jews of much of the guilt they obviously deserve (so they refuse to give the proper credit, or weight, to the Jews' efforts).

3) Their having Jewish friends or associates that come across as being good, productive people; their having had positive experiences with Jews; their knowing of the good work of Jews that has benefited mankind.  Understandably, that clouds their judgement.

4) They have just been overwhelmed mentally, since they were little children, by pro-Jewish propaganda and lies of Jewish innocence, victimhood, and suffering (such as the holocaust-hoax nonsense); and they cannot escape that mentality that has been pounded into their heads by schools (teachers), churches, parents, etc.  All of which has driven them to form the wrong conclusions and opinions as regards this issue, in spite of the fact they are racially aware and generally savvy people socially and politically.

5) They simply don't recognize the concept of 'organized Jewry,' or understand the 'complicit and culpable Jew' concept:  Jewish financial power; influence over and even control of the press and entertainment media; control of finance and banking; disproportionate influence as regards elections/politics/government/foreign policy and in particular Neocon/Zionist warmongering; excessive influence in public education and higher academia; and intensely tribal networking and in-group cooperative skills.  They just don't 'get' the way nearly all Jews, if not personally and actively involved in nefarious anti-White activities, contribute to and financially support those activities with their money, labors, and networking skills.

6) That denial of Jewish guilt allows them to maintain a socially acceptable degree of respectability (as Jews define it and as people like Taylor and Reed seem to perceive it); and by doing that they avoid being lumped in with the anti-Semitic outcasts of contemporary society and becoming associated with the hard-core neo-Nazis and the like.  All of which is very important when it comes to their popularity and success as writers and in other endeavors.  Thus, their soft stances on Jewish culpability and their denials of Jewish anti-White lethality are most likely just strategic in nature.

I personally don't think reason No. 1 is the only, or even the main motivation for either Taylor or Reed when it comes to the Jewish question -- but I could be wrong about that -- it is certainly a possibility.  Their thinking might be tempered to some extent by suggested reasons No. 2-5, but it is hard for me to believe intelligent and sophisticated men such as Taylor and Reed genuinely and sincerely are overly influenced by those factors.  I would suggest that reason No. 6 is a major reason they have taken their questionable positions on this issue.

In any case, I have chosen to post links to some of their work from time to time, sometimes annotating my 'spintros' with a brief comment pointing out their 'errors of omission' as I see it (even though it might seem that these kinds of writers do run some defensive plays for the Jews on occasion).  And as the reader will note, I have even included Taylor's American Renaissance on my blogroll.

We need to keep in mind too that there are other good writers that for whatever reason avoid pointing to the elephant in the room -- people such as Pat Buchanan and Paul Craig Roberts come to mind.

Another consideration when deciding whether or not to use the work of certain writers, websites, and organizations in the effort to wake up more of our people -- we must remember that a reluctance to 'name the Jew' (or a deliberate, calculated intention not to do that) is not the only problematic trait we need to be aware of and keep our eye on.

A case in point -- we have some race mixers that write and publish some very good White Nationalist-oriented material -- writers such as Fred Reed (who would seem to have two strikes against him from the 'purist' standpoint -- yes, he is married to an 'Hispanic' lady, and lives in old Mexico) and John Derbyshire with his Chinese wife.

In Reed's case, it might even get worse -- his thinking and writing might possibly be even further compromised.  I have read (but have not attempted to verify) that his Latina wife has some Jewish heritage.  Some of his writing has, in my opinion, been a little disingenuous in extolling the supposed positive qualities of Mexicans and other Latin Americans, and failed to make an adequate distinction between the general character and abilities of the mestizo majority and the more European, less mongrelized upper classes of predominately Spanish and Portuguese extraction.  I can't help but wonder if he really thinks that the racially alien mestizo invaders from south of the border do not pose a potentially devastating threat to the future of our traditionally White society, culture, and nation?  While I really enjoy and appreciate most of his work, and have linked to some of his essays in the past, that may be why I have been reluctant to link to his 'Fred on Everything' blog in my blogroll.

Going even beyond that -- we do have some (guardedly) 'good Jews' (in my opinion, and if such a thing is possible) (or at least tolerable Jews who do some good work) -- men who produce some very enlightening and educational writings and who resist the agenda of organized Jewry -- men such as Benjamin Freedman (of years gone by), Brother Nathanael Kapner, Gilad Atzmon, Mordechai Vanunu, Norman Finkelstein, Henry Makow, and David Cole.  I have no problem linking to some of their posts from time to time, and have even included Kapner's and Makow's websites in my blogroll.

We even have some good writers who are at least borderline White Nationalists but are also reputed to be homosexuals.  I generally try not to spend too much time thinking or worrying about that, although I find the thought repugnant and kind of shudder-worthy.

The bottom line for me:  So long as these people provide good information that is generally enlightening for White people, both the hitherto unaware and the racially conscious and Jew-wise, and is helpful to the White Nationalist cause; and as long as I do not see any effort on their part to deliberately mislead or deceive their readers; I have no problem contributing in my small way to the propagation of their work when it is amenable to our cause -- helpful in waking up and informing our people.  That said, I do think we need to be constantly aware of their 'problems,' as it were, and we should not hesitate to point them out in introductory remarks when appropriate (we should always be sure that our readers are fully aware of the situation and any 'red flags' that might be fluttering in the breeze).

1 comment:

2c said...

Some people are aggressively suspicious of him, but I don't believe Taylor is a disinfo agent.

I believe he is genuinely concerned with White dispossession and black violent crime.

But for him it's politically expedient to simply omit the Jewish question. It may be a mistake and short sighted.