Knowledge is Power in Our Struggle for Racial Survival
(Information that should be shared with as many of our people as possible -- do your part to counter Jewish control of the mainstream media -- pass it on and spread the word)by Val Koinen
March 11, 2019
So now the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives has passed a resolution condemning anti-Semitism and other so-called bigotry (‘hateful expressions of intolerance’) – essentially condemning hatred of all kinds of minority groups (but of course with no mention of Jewish or Negro or other ‘coloreds’’ hatred of White people and particularly White men).
This ridiculous resolution has caused me to wonder what’s up with our lawmakers attacking such a perfectly normal, helpful, and even essential (and should I say universal?) human trait as ‘hatred’? It just seems to me that this kind of action on the part of the government of our so-called ‘free’ country violates the laws of nature and self-preservation, the fundamentals of common sense and rationality, and yes, the Constitution itself. Not to mention that it is blatantly discriminatory, insulting, and more than a little maddening.
That being the case, I would ask that you give some honest thought to a different ‘take’on this anti-White legislative action.
Expressing ‘hate’ is more than a constitutionally protected right under the First Amendment; it is a natural, biological right. It is a smart, defensive mechanism often useful in protecting oneself, one’s family, one’s progeny, and one’s property. And our heritage and culture, and our future. It can be and often is a legitimate ‘threat response.’
Thus, hatred of terrorists, murderers, home invaders, rapists, child molesters, and even thieves is considered to be normal, acceptable behavior. We can have those thoughts; we can talk about those problems; we can discuss solutions.
Another example would be the ‘hatred’ of rattlesnakes on the part of a frontier wife and mother, having been taken by her pioneer husband to live in a log cabin in the wild, uncivilized West of the 19th century. Most such young frontier mothers would have rightfully and rationally hated rattlesnakes with a passion as soon as they realized the threat they presented to their children – and especially if one had threatened, or worse yet bitten and killed, say, the baby of the family.
Then, what if the husband/father discovered a whole den of snakes in close proximity to the cabin – wouldn’t he ‘hate’ that, and try to control the situation by setting out to get rid of them?
Now, the kind of natural, defensive hatred I have described in the above examples admittedly may not be exactly the same thing contemplated by the Democrats in the above-referenced Congressional resolution. But the problems, and the motivations behind rational solutions, are similar and I would suggest that the basic concepts are essentially the same. And that they are rational, legitimate, and valid. It’s not so much a matter of hating the rattlesnakes (or other predators, or weeds, or Jews, or Negroes, or Muslims) as it is a matter of hating the situations those entities cause by way of their detrimental, dangerous, and oftentimes even deadly presence.
In other words – you don’t have to stare at one individual weed in your garden or lawn and ‘hate’ it – but it is entirely rational and proper to hate the situation when weeds take over those lawns and gardens. What I am trying to point out to you, the reader, is that we Whites have the same right – the same natural duty – as any other group or organism to control and minimize the damage done to our own kind (our ‘people’) and our societies by other invasive species and subspecies of all kinds. And that includes all the serious negatives brought to our (rapidly diminishing) majority White society by the groups the Democrats are telling us we cannot hate, even for just cause.
That natural ‘hate the snake’ syndrome could just as well apply to any number of other ‘bad actors’ – floodwaters, hornets, wolves, serial killers, AIDS spreaders, dope dealers, sex traffickers, outbreaks of deadly diseases, or hostile Indians (back in the day of the frontier housewife mentioned above). And it could apply with similar justification to ‘invasive species’ of many other kinds, and for many different legitimate reasons. Again, we have always had the right to discuss (oftentimes in an unfriendly or even ‘hateful’ manner) those things and the situations presented by them and to take appropriate corrective action to alleviate the problems.
Of course, that 'corrective action' -- even if partially driven by rational hatred -- needn't make it necessary that we somehow exterminate our adversaries as they are trying to do to us. We just need control them and the objectionable situations in order to ensure our survival.
With reference to defensive hatred of threats to our well-being, shouldn’t we Whites, as a group and like any other group, be permitted (in fact expected) to hate the behavior of a group such as the Jews, or at least the greater part of that tribe, who have been the proximate force behind the start of so many major wars and the killing of tens of millions of White people; who have worked so long and diligently to destroy our White culture and our Western Civilization; who have done everything they could to destroy the White family; who have tirelessly promoted such things as radical feminism, radical liberalism, pernicious ‘political correctness,’ worship of Negro sports figures and entertainers on TV and in movies? Who have unceasingly promoted massive immigration of non-Whites (both illegal and quasi-legal); who have beat us over the head and robbed us blind with their ‘holocaust’ fraud; who have effectively taken over our media, our elections, and our federal government; and so much more? Who have, in a word, worked long and hard to commit genocide against the White race – to exterminate us?
We aren’t justified in hating the tons of horrible things the Jews and the Israelis have done? Maybe you need to do some research – I think it could well be an eye-opener for you.
And what of the Negroes, considering their generally low IQ and comparative lack of impulse control; their vastly disproportionate commission of serious, violent, and oftentimes deadly interracial crime; their requiring so much incarceration (thereby necessitating so much prison capacity); their comparatively non-existent history and incompatible culture; their drainage of our (White peoples’) wealth to support them with welfare; their literal ruination of so many of our neighborhoods and even entire cities; their drag on our public education; their harming some of the most vulnerable of our people by way of government and business preferences, affirmative action programs, etc.; their contamination and despoliation of our gene pool via miscegenation; and on and on ad nauseam? We’re not supposed to think of these things or to hate those threats to our society, to our resource base, to our social/political well-being and development, to our genetic heritage, and to the future potential and prospects of our race (as a distinct sub-species of humankind)?
We are not supposed to recognize that these realities make it abundantly clear that the Negroes, on average and as a group, are just incapable of participating successfully in our White, Euro-centric society?
And what of the mestizo invasion, and the many ways in which those people negatively affect our communities? And the behavior of Muslim extremists? And the Muslim hordes now invading our European homelands? Well, you get the point (at least I hope you do).
Keep in mind – all living species (and subspecies), if they hope to survive and prosper, must compete with others with which they occupy the same territory and natural living environment. If they don’t compete – if they capitulate – they will perish. We Whites have for many years been ceding our right to exist in our own nations to the scheming Jews and their alien minions.
In closing, and even though I myself am not a religious man, I do place some value on the wisdom and guidance that can be found in many parts of the Christian bible. I believe that one passage in particular is pertinent to this discussion (Ecclesiastes 3:1-8): ‘There is a time for everything, … a time to love and a time to hate, …’
The Banality of “Hate”
Alien species are 'primary cause' for global extinctions, study finds
House passes resolution condemning anti-Semitism and Islamophobia
Where Is That Vaunted White IQ?
Trump calls Democrats the 'anti-Israel" and 'anti-Jewish' party after House vote condemning hate
Allegiance to a horror show
The Black BS Just Keeps Going On and On
The House Democrats’ “Rebuke” of Rep. Ilhan Omar Is a Fraud for Many Reasons, Including Its Wild Distortion of Her Comments
John Derbyshire: One Cheer For Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Mogadishupolis)